ldconfig when PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES (and linux ports)

[Boris Samorodov]

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:38:29 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:09:47AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:58:47 +0200 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Boris Samorodov p????e v so 04. 08. 2007 v 01:30 +0400:
> > 
> > > > Seems that running ldconfig while building a package at package
> > > > cluster (i.e. when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined) is quite useless. [1]
> > > > 
> > > > To be more specific I'm interested at linux ports. ATM we run linux
> > > > ldconfig (using linuxulator) _at package building_. Hence to create a
> > > > package for FC6 port we should change compat.linux.osrelease (which I
> > > > don't like and try to avoid). If the "ldconfig" stage may be skipped
> > > > when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then things get way too easier both
> > > > for default kernel linux.osrelease and default linux_base port change.
> > 
> > > I don't follow - what is the problem?
> > 
> > An FC6 port can't be build (and more specific -- linux-fc6 ldconfig
> > doesn't run) with current default compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.2. So
> > this sysctl should be changed to 2.6.16 for package building sake.
> > When the default compat.linux.osrelease will be switched to 2.6.16 we
> > will get the other way round problem if we try to build and FC4 port.
> > 
> > I don't like the status quo and want to find a way to siplify it.

> That's a kernel problem, not a ldconfig problem.

Kris, now I don't follow. Can you explain what did you mean?


WBR
-- 
bsam