gerald at pfeifer.com
Fri Apr 13 22:32:22 UTC 2007
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> No, the patch won't work. According to
> the right way is always define WANT_GNOME which won't pull
> any gnome dependencies unless USE_GNOME is used.
> I think after USE_PERL5_BUILD line, add
> and use += for USE_GNOME after bsd.port.pre.mk
Thanks. This matches my reading of
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html as well, so I committed
the patch at the end of this message to hopefully address the breakage.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>> I think after USE_PERL5_BUILD line, add
>> and use += for USE_GNOME after bsd.port.pre.mk
> The usual workaround is
> USE_GNOME= # empty
> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> USE_GNOME+= foo bar baz
What Rong-en proposed matches my reading of our GNOME porting
documentation, and according to my reading of bsd.port.mk your
proposal is just another way of achieving the same result. Is
What worries me more is that the same documentation also has:
Note: You cannot add extra default USE_GNOME components after the
.include <bsd.port.pre.mk>. That is, the following is wrong :
USE_GNOME+= gtk12 # WRONG!
and lang/gcc41 has the following right now after .include
USE_GNOME= gtk20 libartlgpl2
Should we move the USE_GNOME=gtk20 part into lang/gcc41-withgcjawt
and only keep USE_GNOME+=libartlgpl2 at this point in lang/gcc41 or
is the current use okay in this specific setting?
PS: For now I committed the patch below which ought to be correct in
any case. I won't be able to be online too much over the weekend, so
if any of you please be more than welcome to apply any followup patch
as needed if you are confident it is the right thing to do.
RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/lang/gcc41/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.318
diff -u -3 -p -r1.318 Makefile
--- Makefile 10 Apr 2007 05:24:27 -0000 1.318
+++ Makefile 13 Apr 2007 22:06:51 -0000
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ USE_BZIP2= yes
More information about the freebsd-ports