Dropping X11BASE in favour for LOCALBASE

Marcus von Appen mva at sysfault.org
Thu Oct 19 19:52:02 UTC 2006


On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
> > dropped in favour for LOCALBASE.
> > 
> > Is there an actual schedule until when this should happen and how should
> > we deal with our current ports now? Just remove the USE_X_PREFIX macro
> > when we submit new PRs for (our) existing ports or anything besides
> > that? 
> > 
> > A further explanation why that move shall happen would be great, too :-).
> 
> It can only possibly happen after a team of interested people have put
> in the work to fix the several thousand ports that have hard-coded
> knowledge of /usr/X11R6 (i.e. which do not respect X11BASE anyway).

So what was the announcement about then? Was the X11BASE vs. LOCALBASE
section within it just a generalization of the GNOME changes and X11BASE
will be kept? Or should we maintainers switch to LOCALBASE whenever
possible from now on?

Regards
Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20061019/ba02dd52/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list