how to keep PORTVERSION from going backwards?
Max Laier
max at love2party.net
Tue Nov 14 16:32:30 PST 2006
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 01:25, Mike Brown wrote:
> How should I handle this?
>
> The software vendor version numbers go like this:
> 1.0b3 (older release)
> 1.0 (current release)
> 1.0.1 (upcoming release)
>
> The port currently has PORTVERSION = 1.0.b3, and has not made use of
> DISTVERSION.
>
> What's a good way to set PORTVERSION (and DISTVERSION, if needed) when
> I update the port to the current and upcoming releases? I don't want
> the PORTVERSION to go backwards. I assume that's what would happen if I
> set it to just match the vendor's version numbers, and I assume that's
> bad.
See:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN521
--
/"\ Best regards, | mlaier at freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier at EFnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20061115/f094d257/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list