Implicit port tag (was: [HEADSUP] TinyBSD and ports
applications)
Jeremie Le Hen
jeremie at le-hen.org
Thu Nov 2 20:58:47 UTC 2006
Hi,
(Cc'ed to ports@)
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Matteo Riondato wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 05:49:38PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > For instance, lets's you're building a TinyBSD image with
> > net/nemesis which depends on net/libnet10. You neither have this
> > later port installed. The current TinyBSD implementation will
> > leave net/libnet10 installed on the build system, although I agree
> > this is more a problem relatde to port infrastructure which doesn't
> > record whether a port is an implied dependency or has been
> > explicitely installed by the user. AFAIK.
> >
> > A workaround could be to null-mount the ports directory into the
> > temporary folder were the TinyBSD image is built, then chroot into
> > this folder and install the port from here. Afterward you would
> > remove www,doc,share,include,man stuff.
>
> This is similar to what freesbie does when the installports plugin is
> used. Note that if you really want a small image, you should remove
Would it be possible to add a tag to ports that have been implicitely
installed because of a dependency, either for build-time or run-time ?
Cheers,
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list