New category - ports/packages specific tools?

Pav Lucistnik pav at
Mon May 15 22:46:41 UTC 2006

Shaun Amott píše v po 15. 05. 2006 v 23:41 +0100:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:38:21AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > 
> > 28 is way too little to warrant a category.  Plus you're missing a good
> > name for it.
> > 
> Okay, fair enough. I was hoping some more would surface. And... there's
> accessibility, which is even smaller.

Yeah. There is also mbone, which is, I'm not afraid to use that word,

Personally I set a threshold of 100 ports to pay any attention to new
category proposals. YMMV.

Pav Lucistnik <pav at>
              <pav at>

In fact, the GAH is a very powerful and secretive organization whose
single weakness is its lack of existance.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list