Questiion about followup pr

Beech Rintoul beech at alaskaparadise.com
Mon May 15 06:56:40 UTC 2006


On Sunday 14 May 2006 22:06, you wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:59:57PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > What is the accepted way to send a patch with a followup to a pr? The
> > system seems to mangle them badly either pasted in the mail or attached?
>
> Pasted in the mail. What exactly do you mean by "mangle"?

I tried both pasting and attaching. Both came out with extra characters. I'm 
using kmail and haven't had a problem with it before. In the future should I 
use another mailer?

Beech

-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech at alaskaparadise.com
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Alaska Paradise
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \  - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060515/dda0da5b/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list