Questiion about followup pr
Beech Rintoul
beech at alaskaparadise.com
Mon May 15 06:56:40 UTC 2006
On Sunday 14 May 2006 22:06, you wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:59:57PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > What is the accepted way to send a patch with a followup to a pr? The
> > system seems to mangle them badly either pasted in the mail or attached?
>
> Pasted in the mail. What exactly do you mean by "mangle"?
I tried both pasting and attaching. Both came out with extra characters. I'm
using kmail and haven't had a problem with it before. In the future should I
use another mailer?
Beech
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech at alaskaparadise.com
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060515/dda0da5b/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list