HEADS UP for maintainers of web applications

[Pav Lucistnik]

Doug Barton píše v pá 12. 05. 2006 v 13:25 -0700:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Doug Barton pí¹e v èt 11. 05. 2006 v 02:17 -0700:
> >> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >>> Hi people,
> >>>
> >>> it will soon become mandatory to stop installing web applications into
> >>> Apache specific directories, like ${PREFIX}/www/data,
> >>> ${PREFIX}/www/cgi-bin etc.
> >> How did those directories become "apache specific," and where was that
> >> decision and the prohibitive policy discussed and agreed to?

> > And, most importantly for me, it fixes pkg-plist fallout from recent php
> > change.
> 
> Sorry, you have the cart and the horse confused. If php needs to be fixed,
> fix it. But don't try to jam every other web based port maintainer into your
> version of what the world should look like.

I am not going to fight someone else's war.  All I care about are that
those pkg-plists are formally correct.  I will be adding
'@dirrmtry www/data' on sight.  If you don't want to change your ports,
fine, that's your decision.  I'm not going to force anyone to change his
port in that direction, even if I believe it's a good idea.  Feel free
to disagree.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for they are subtle and
quick to anger.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060514/e7758420/attachment.pgp