ports structure and improvement suggestions
pav at FreeBSD.org
Thu May 11 13:42:03 UTC 2006
Frank Laszlo píše v čt 11. 05. 2006 v 08:09 -0400:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2006 06:48:23 -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote
> >> Serge Gagnon wrote:
> >>> If you're talking about message that the port is saying about KNOB, try
> >>> grep ECHO Makefile and if you're talking about message while the port is
> >>> installing stuff, try cat pkg-message before installing this port ;-)
> >> As I said before, a simple method to fix this problem would be to
> >> extend the way OPTIONS works, where we create a new target to list
> >> possibly options for the port, and require maintainers to keep it up
> >> to date. i.e.
> >> # make options
> >> ===> Options for foo/bar.
> >> WITH_BAR Build port with support for bar
> >> WITH_FOO blah
> >> WITH_A blah blah...
> >> This would be fairly simple to implement using the current way
> >> OPTIONS are handled, I'll add this to my list of todo items.
> > We already have this. Tried make showconfig?
> This only shows currently configured options and depends on the
> existence of _OPTIONSFILE. I would like to see a target that shows user
> configurable options BEFORE they are built/configured.
You are right. That's not very useful. I have just submitted this
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060511/670f331b/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports