ports structure and improvement suggestions
serge.gagnon at b2b2c.ca
Wed May 10 19:20:43 UTC 2006
>>>>> On Wed, 10 May 2006, "martinko" == martinko wrote:
martinko> yes, you're right. it's not so difficult. but only if you talk
martinko> about one port. now imagine a few more of them. and things get
martinko> worse.. another example -- a few days ago i deleted all the
martinko> installed packages and started from scratch. mind you right now
martinko> i've got 375 packages. that's quite a lot. but i can imagine
martinko> many people have even more. now imagine how you're going to
martinko> configure them all. with options you're asked once, you cannot
martinko> miss them and they saved for later use. and they're especially
martinko> useful when a port has many dependencies. not speaking of
martinko> metaports. and, as already said, portupgrade doesn't handle this
martinko> very well. also editing makefile in conditional way is not good.
Just my point of view but, you don't have know or set all the dependency's
KNOB. Eg: print/apsfilter need shells/bash for its own purpose. If you're
not running this shell as login shell, you don't want to know or set to
build it static or not.
I think that it can be fastidious to set all these options the first time
you're building your ports.
As an exemple, imagine you're installing your ports tree for the first time
and then go to x11/kde !!
Secondo, I think that most of the users know approximatly what this or that
port do and if they have to modify their build with WITH/WITHOUT or not.
Just my point of view again.
However, if such a system will be put in place, I think that the idea of
asking the user once and at the beginning of the build processe is a good
one. I like to start a big build then go to sleep and not thinking that my
station is, perhaps, asking me something or not.
I'm just scared about the fact that I can't imagine myself answering a
listing of one miles long before building a port even if it's just one time
at the beginning and that these options will be saved. And asking again to
this same listing if I want to change these options.
However, I saw something on this thread that it could be very cool. The
idea of one file that contain these option like
Very good idea if i'm not forced to fill this file with a system like I
described above. Using vi is cool !
IMHO, if you're not able to read a man page and use vi to modify this file
who contains the information concerning your port, you build your port as
they are with their default setting, that's all.
GAGNON serge <serge.gagnon at b2b2c.ca>
PGP KEY-ID: 0xBBC1478F
PGP Fingerprint: B48B 4633 28F5 28F6 7A62 5650 69C8 E293 BBC1 478F
PPG Key: http://quenix2.dyndns.org:7777 | telnet quenix2.dyndns.org 7777
Cvsdadm: Tool for CVSd pserver user administration
More information about the freebsd-ports