An autoconf bikeshed
pav at FreeBSD.org
Sat May 6 09:22:12 UTC 2006
Lyndon Nerenberg píše v pá 05. 05. 2006 v 20:11 -0600:
> On Sat, 6 May 2006, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > It's also no longer imake, but autotools based.
> That is *not* an improvement!
> Have you noticed how autoconf has become such a bloated twisted mass of
> goo that it now needs its own configuration tool? It has become a parody
> of itself.
> This is not progress.
One major advantage of using autotools over imake is that now you can
paralellize the build using make -jX flags. You can't with imake.
That's essentially cutting the compile times in half on dual-core
One major drawback of using autotools is that every distfile grows about
250 kB of repeated code. With modular X, that's a lot of bytes to
As for developers use, I'd say much more people today are familiar with
autotools then with imake. Imake is a dying beast. Going with mainstream
is always good to get more people involved.
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
Autumn changed into Winter ... Winter changed into Spring ... Spring
changed back into Autumn and Autumn gave Winter and Spring a miss and went
straight on into Summer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060506/3b7a62e4/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports