brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Thu May 4 18:39:40 UTC 2006
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:57:27PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > Aren Olvalde Tyr wrote:
> > > Perhaps it would be good, if, say on the corresponding port entry on the
> > > FreeBSD ports webpage, it listed all the options used for building the binary
> > > package. For example, for the "Package" link, instead of simply linking to
> > > the package, it could link to a page entry listing all of the build options
> > > used, with the package download link at the bottom. Or something like that.
> > >
> > > Just an idea. What do people think?
> > I'd even go further. This is something I have been thinking about on and
> > off. Namely, a FLAVOUR system for packages. A maintainer specifies up to
> > three FLAVOURs per port, which set various flags for building the port.
> In FreeBSD land these are called "slave ports", and you can have as
> many as you like. I don't have any interest in adding a separate
> "flavour" system in parallel to this.
With MPI based parallel code there are times where I think a flavor
system might scale better, but I haven't done the work to expose the
non-scaling yet. The problem is that we've got ~5 versions of MPI
in the tree, but each one of those really should be buildable with
different C and Fortran compilers so you could easily see 50+ MPIs.
Multiple each applicaiton by that and things get crazy. :)
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060504/c3b64b0e/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports