portversion and distversion - why not?
infofarmer at gmail.com
Mon May 1 19:33:11 UTC 2006
FATAL: Makefile: either PORTVERSION or DISTVERSION must be specified, not both.
Can somebody please explain why? It comes in handy
to be able to define illegal distversion instead of redefining
the whole distname. B.p.m was designed to handle two
different variables in the first place. Should we really
abstain from using this functionality?
More information about the freebsd-ports