NOT installing the .la files

[Matthias Andree]

On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Mark Linimon wrote:

> With nearly 15,000 ports, certain compromises have to be made to make
> the maintainance tasks easier, even if that costs some inodes.  (The
> Ports Collection is not optimized to minimize inodes ATM anyway).  This
> is one such compromise.
> 
> As far as I am concerned, this needs to end the discussion so we can go
> back to working on the harder problems.

How do we go about changing ports? Do .la-only changes need the
PORTREVISION bumped because the pkg-plist necessarily changed?

Should we (I'm wearing my porter's hat now), submit .la-only changes?

-- 
Matthias Andree