portinstall breaks with -m "-j 4"
LoN_Kamikaze at gmx.de
Sat Jul 22 15:34:01 UTC 2006
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> L> > -j is not supported for ports.
> L> >
> L> Well, it should be, with all the multi-core CPUs coming. And all other
> L> targets work fine with -j. It's solely the install target that's broken.
> L> Is there any reason why it is not supported?
> Too many software authors do not design their build invironment for parallel
> work. Many ports broke in configure and/or build phases just with make -j2.
> D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
Well, at least the ports system itself should not be broken able to work with this. With larger ports I manage to reduce build times by 40% with distcc and a second machine. As far as I see it the number of ports breaking is rather low. On many ports it simply doesn't have an effect, but so far only editors/vim really breaks on my systems.
BTW, I apologize for this is not at all a portupgrade issue, but an issue of the ports system.
More information about the freebsd-ports