Reason for 11 or 1.1 appended to SDL files?
lehmann at ans-netz.de
Thu Jul 6 17:12:03 UTC 2006
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> I wonder what is the reason SDL has it's version appended everywhere
> (include/SDL11 instead of include/SDL, libSDL-1.1.so instead of
> libSDL.so, sdl11-config instead of sdl-config). It takes extra time when
> porting SDL software, extra patches need to be added. Is there any good
> reason for such changes to sdl' file names?
Once we had SDL 1.0 in the tree too and this was done to avoid conflicts
between both versions.
More information about the freebsd-ports