Something wrong with portlint?

[Brooks Davis]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:38:56PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 15:24:43 -0500 Frank Laszlo 
> <laszlof at vonostingroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >Put a newline after the "commented" section on the top, all is fine.
> >Like so:
> >
> ># New ports collection makefile for:    barnyard
> ># Date created:                         1 Feb 2005
> ># Whom:                                 pauls
> >#
> ># $FreeBSD: ports/security/barnyard/Makefile,v 1.5 2005/11/15 06:50:54
> >ade Exp $
> >#
> ><newline here>
> >PORTNAME=       barnyard
> >
> >
> >Cheers,
> >    Frank
> 
> Sheesh.  Wouldn't it be nice if the Handbook actually stipulated that?

Or better yet if the worthless comment section died except for the
$FreeBSD$ bit. :-P

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060124/84ea7ea0/attachment.bin