Something wrong with portlint?

Paul Schmehl pauls at utdallas.edu
Tue Jan 24 08:55:22 PST 2006


--On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:32:09 -0500 Frank Laszlo 
<laszlof at vonostingroup.com> wrote:

> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> I had all sorts of problems with portlint yesterday.  I kept getting
>> errors that the COMMENT was missing even though it wasn't.  I got
>> complaints about things being out of order when they weren't.  (X is
>> in the MAINTAINER section - but it wasn't.)  In the end, I had to
>> submit the ports even though they wouldn't pass portlint because *I*
>> knew they were done correctly (and they worked without errors), not
>> because portlint gave its stamp of approval.
>>
>> Has there been a recent code change that might have caused this?  (I'm
>> running 5.4 SECURITY on an i386 processor.)
>>
>> Paul Schmehl (pauls at utdallas.edu)
>> Adjunct Information Security Officer
>> University of Texas at Dallas
>> AVIEN Founding Member
>> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>>
> There has been some extensive port framework changes (see -ports
> archive) If you send the PR in question, I'd gladly take a look at it
> for you. Thanks
>
There's actually two - 92239 and 92241

Paul Schmehl (pauls at utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list