portupgrade slow

[Ulrich Spoerlein]

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>While 15 to 30 minutes is really long, and I think Ulrich found your
>problem, portupgrade is a memory hog nowadays... but we have 14k ports
>which the pgktools keep in a DB in some way (as a graph), so is anyone
>out there who speaks ruby and is willing to have a look if this can be
>optimized?

I think it's the dependancy checking. Compare the startup time of 
portupgrade -na vs. portupgrade -Ona

Ulrich Spoerlein
-- 
  PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD				Encrypted mail welcome!
Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70  6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
Don't know. Don't care.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060210/e89f2376/attachment.bin