www/libwww and SSL

[Doug Barton]

Paul Schmehl wrote:

> What I want isn't really relevant.  I'm simply suggesting that updating
> the port to include an OPTION for with_ssl seems unnecessary *unless*
> someone is going to port sipX.  Have you looked at sipX?  Porting it
> would not be simple, and I wonder how much demand there would be.  In
> any case, *unless* sipX gets ported, it doesn't make sense to me to
> update www/libwww simply to enable an option no one has asked for until
> now.

OTOH, what harm does it cause?

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection