why "-R" und not "-r"?
Heino Tiedemann
rotkaps_spam_trap at gmx.de
Tue Dec 26 03:04:53 PST 2006
Hi There,
one question about this antry in UPDATING:
,----
| 20061221:
| AFFECTS: users of security/gnupg
| AUTHOR: kuriyama at FreeBSD.org
|
| The security/gnupg port was upgraded to 2.0.1 (with securty fix)
| and good-old gnupg-1.4.6 was repocopied to security/gnupg1.
|
| Both of security/gnupg (2.x) and security/gnupg1 (1.4.x) are
| designed not to conflict with each other. So you can use
| security/gnupg1 for gpg(1), and use security/gnupg for gpg2(1)
| commands.
|
| All directly dependents are $PORTREVISION bumped, so portupgrade -R
| gnupg will works fine. After portupgrade, you will have both of
| gnupg-2.0.1 and gnupg-1.4.6.
`----
Why "portupgrade -R gnup"? Isn't it "portupgrade -r gnup"?
Heino
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list