portupgrade

[Kris Kennaway]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:26:53AM +0200, gareth wrote:
> On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)...
> 
> sure, the original question then since we've moved lists:
> 
> On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote:
> > hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session:
> >
> > # portversion -l "<"
> > gnupg                       <
> > p5-Compress-Zlib            <
> > p5-IO-Socket-SSL            <
> > p5-PathTools                <
> > portupgrade                 <
> > rsync                       <
> > spamass-milter              <
> > # portupgrade -aF
> 
> 
> > What does portversion -l '<' -v say about the old and new versions?
> 
> # portversion -l '<' -v
> gnupg-1.4.5_1               <  needs updating (port has 1.4.5_2)
> p5-Compress-Zlib-1.42       <  needs updating (port has 2.001)
> p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01       <  needs updating (port has 1.02)
> p5-PathTools-3.23           <  needs updating (port has 3.24)
> portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2     <  needs updating (port has 2.2.2,2)
> rsync-2.6.8_2               <  needs updating (port has 2.6.9)
> spamass-milter-0.3.1_1      <  needs updating (port has 0.3.1_3)

Those versions are all a couple of weeks stale, so I guess your ports
tree really isn't up-to-date.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20061204/9f7328ac/attachment.pgp