INDEX build failed for 4.x

[Florent Thoumie]

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 10:53 -0500, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 10:27, LI Xin wrote:
> >
> > Well, the world is imperfect, and sometimes the automated bots run by us
> > will not be able to explicitly point out which port is getting problem...
> >
> > All the purpose of this sort of letters (e.g. tinderbox build failure
> > reports, etc) is in the hope that someone can pick up the work and fix
> > it before users actually being hit by a bug and thus save their time.
> > In other words, this is something like "Look out!  Ports tree have some
> > *known* trouble now and please do not report problems (without patch, of
> > course) until things gets fixed."
> >
> > Cheers,
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> 
> Tinderbox failure reports I understand. I guess this type of report goes into 
> my ignore category, unless I'm willing to help of course. Not in this case 
> though, I only have 6-STABLE systems.

It's also broken on 6.x. This is kind of mail saying "It's broken, we
know, don't mail about it except if you have a fix".

-- 
Florent Thoumie
flz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060828/29efc8fa/attachment.pgp