ports tree tagging again

[Kris Kennaway]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:21:38PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful
> as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers.
> 
> Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from
> marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We often work on some
> things together and/or from multiple locations. It feels so
> awkward to send patches in email attachments or uploading
> them somewhere.
> 
> Moreover, with a new VCS, I expect a possibility for maintainers
> to gain commit rights to some separate branches. Committers
> may then easily review and merge changes to the trunk.

Note to readers: please avoid the temptation to now follow up and
discuss the merits of which VCS is best.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20060818/6df012e2/attachment.pgp