package-depend oddity (was: Re:
[ports-i386@pointyhat.freebsd.org: dspampd-2.00.r2 failed on i386 5] )
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Wed Oct 19 14:33:27 PDT 2005
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:26:42 -0400
Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:17:33PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > Why does it depend on both clamavs ?
> > >
> > > From some dependency..you'd have to trace through to see which
> > > one.
> >
> > Hmm ... the interactive page below isn't showing it:
> >
> > http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portdependencytree.py?category=mail&portname=dspampd
>
> Looks like clamav came in with the recent commit to dspam-devel 2 days
> ago (also by the same maintainer ;-).
OK, I see it now. So ... I should depend on clam instead of
clamav-devel in dspampd to match the defaults from dspam-devel (which
will be dspam in a few days)
- OPTIONS+= CLAMAV "Use clamav as antivir module" off
- OPTIONS+= CLAMAV_DEVEL "Use clamav as antivir module" on
+ OPTIONS+= CLAMAV "Use clamav as antivir module" on
+ OPTIONS+= CLAMAV_DEVEL "Use clamav as antivir module" off
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list