SHA256 checksums

[Kris Kennaway]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:37:00PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:16:40 +0200, Vasil Dimov wrote
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:24:05PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > If someone can do this in a way that is 
> > > 
> > >                *** Careful ***
> > > 
> > > i.e. they:
> > > 
> > > * verify that they are not committing random other changes together
> > > with the sha checksum
> > > 
> > > * deal with the fact that 'make checksum' on their machine may not add
> > > checksums for all of the files listed in distinfo (and in such a case
> > > will actually remove them, breaking the port for others)
> > > 
> > > then it would be better to do them in batches instead of getting
> > > committers to deal with hundreds of individual PRs.
> > 
> > Ok, here is a tool that takes a ports dir and hacks it, adding 
> > sha256 sums for the available distfiles.
> 
> Where? Anyway, "make makesum" is not enough?

That's what I meant instead of 'make checksum'.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20051110/66f52746/attachment.bin