Azureus_2.3.0.4 dependency missing

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Fri Nov 4 19:29:37 PST 2005


On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:26:46PM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> 
> On 05/11/2005, at 2:17 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:06:28PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> >>>>    FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=YES
> >>>>
> >>>This is a nice recipe for corrupting your package installations.  If
> >>>you are encountering situations where you think you need to use it,
> >>>you're doing something wrong.
> >>>
> >>
> >>it's been there since 1948, $diety is about the only one who
> >>knows why.  what's the danger?
> >>
> >
> >You spam new packages on top of old, leaving behind extra files that
> >can confuse later builds.
> >
> >
> >>so, i removed it and
> >>
> >>roam.psg.com:/usr/src# cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile 2>&1 > tee cvsup.log
> >>roam.psg.com:/usr/src# grep azureus cvsup.log
> >>roam.psg.com:/usr/src# cd /usr/ports/net/azureus
> >>roam.psg.com:/usr/ports/net/azureus# make
> >>===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
> >>===>  Extracting for azureus-2.3.0.4_3
> >>=> Checksum OK for Azureus_2.3.0.4_source.zip.
> >>===>   azureus-2.3.0.4_3 depends on file: /usr/local/eclipse/ 
> >>plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.freebsd.x86_3.1.1.jar - found
> >>===>   azureus-2.3.0.4_3 depends on executable: unzip - found
> >>/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/jar: not found
> >>*** Error code 127
> >>
> >>Stop in /usr/ports/net/azureus.
> >>
> >
> >Right, I didn't say it was a magic fix.  It's possible that if you've
> >been relying on this for a long time because of an incorrect way you
> >do your upgrades then your system is cluttered with old files and that
> >caused the ports tree to become confused here.
> >
> >Look at the example in the pkg_which manpage and go through and clean
> >out all the old cruft you have on your system (back it up first in
> >case you make a mistake).
> 
> Actually, I've pulled lioux up for this before :)  The azureus port  
> needs JAVA_EXTRACT=yes since it is using jar in the extract stage.   
> Pointyhat would have picked it up soon enough.

OK, good.  OP should still clean up his system to avoid other problems
though :)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20051104/29268236/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list