mail/policyd name conflict

[Edwin Groothuis]

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:49:11AM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> So I'd like to suggest to rename the existing mail/policyd to
> mail/policyd-spf, for example.  It might be a good idea to rename the
> new port to mail/policyd-somethingelse anyway, if we can come up with a
> sufficiently descriptive (and short!) "somethingelse" part.

I would call them
    mail/postfix-policyd
    mail/postfix-policyd-spf

But that is what you said already.

If there are getting more which just are described as postfix
"policyd" ports, just call them postfix-policyd-a, postfix-policyd-b
and so on.

Edwin
-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin at mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/