HEADSUP: ports freeze delay
mezz7 at cox.net
Mon Mar 14 18:51:06 PST 2005
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 03:39:28 +0100, Danny Pansters <danny at ricin.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2005 03:04, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 15. March 2005 02:47, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 02:40 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>> > > On Monday, 14. March 2005 19:24, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
>> > > > Since portmgr decided to get new Xorg version 6.8.2 into ports
>> > > > before the freeze, we need some more time to test it than
>> > > >
>> > > > Ports freeze is now scheduled to begin on March 21, 2005 and will
>> > > > last 10 days.
>> > >
>> > > Uhm. According to marcus@'s last HEADS UP (Death, taxes, and...ports
>> > > freeze), the ports-freeze was scheduled to begin on March 25th and
>> > > "at least two weeks". How exactly will a negative delay and
>> > > of period help Xorg getting tested?
>> > I sent a follow up immediately after that. I mistyped. It should
>> > read March 15.
>> I guess I can consider myself lucky then, since my own schedule for KDE
>> was firmly based on March 25. I guess March 21 will be doable with some
> I was also under the impression that it was the 25th. Please have this
> set in stone next time, and published. It's too unclear now.
marcus actually did sent second message near five to seven minutes or
less, this is a crystal clear in the first place that he has it typo. Are
you telling me that people don't read the second message?
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports