Just a note about include files in ports

[Pav Lucistnik]

Kris Kennaway píše v út 29. 11. 2005 v 15:40 -0500:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:25:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Be careful with includes in a port build. I have caught two ports using
> > the include files installed by a previous version of the port instead
> > of the local port copy of the same include file. (Yes, one was in one
> > of my own ports.) In particular, configure args that put the -I
> > to /usr/local/include or /usr/X11/include before the -I ${WRKSRC}/..../include
> > can break or at least compile incorrectly if the port include files change
> > between releases. If you are lucky, it will fail.
> 
> Parts of KDE and GNOME do this :-( It's one of the main reasons that
> 'portupgrade' doesn't just work for upgrading them.

No, they don't do that. What KDE/GNOME really does is moving libraries
between packages. That hurts on updates.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

Qlzqqlzup> ducks turn up in odd places
otie> as in cartoons.
  -- #angband
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20051129/bddc240f/attachment.bin