Challenge during the ports freeze

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Fri Aug 5 17:45:19 GMT 2005


On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 06:48:47PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # kris at obsecurity.org / 2005-08-05 11:23:11 -0400:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 08:01:15AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> > > Munin behaves this way in all other platform ports. Changing this
> > > behaviour would make the FreeBSD the sore thumb of the Munin ports ;-)
> > 
> > I remember these previous discussions and accept that it would take
> > some work to make munin-node ports-conformant, but unfortunately, it's
> > not easy to exclude this port from the standard package checks (no
> > other packages need that), which means it will have to stay listed as
> > a "broken" port for now because of these extra files.
> 
>     How about IGNORing it forever?

Yeah, it could be marked IGNORE in the PACKAGE_BUILDING case to hide
it from the error list.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050805/a92be0f3/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list