New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers]

[Florent Thoumie]

Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Mark Linimon píše v pá 29. 07. 2005 v 16:10 -0500:
> 
> 
>>>Whole another deal is if we should be fixing flaws in the software
>>>itself, or even adding new features.
>>
>>Nope.  The Ports Collection should be a framework for installing
>>someone's else's software on FreeBSD.  PRs about new features, or bugs
>>in the softwanre itself, need to be closed and the submitter referred
>>to the author(s).  IIRC the PR Submission Guidelines state this.  PRs
>>should be about something not working _on FreeBSD specifically_.
> 
> 
> Good to hear that from someone wearing portmgr's hat. I'll start
> enforcing this from now on.

	Please, don't tell me you weren't already doing that :)
	I always wondered why we had sw-bug class.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
flz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050731/3600e7f2/signature.bin