PR machine broken?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:11:19PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Lun  1 ao? 05 ? 18:44:18 +0200, Paul Schmehl <pauls at utdallas.edu>
>  ?crivait?:
> > >By the way, this is really an update, and the RCS tag must be preserved.
> > >You should resubmit it as a patch, because it will be committed this
> > >way, and we want to keep the history in CVS.
> > >
> > OK.  Should I resubmit using the PR that was just issued?
> 
> Yes, please. If it is important, you can compress + uuencode it.
> 
> > >I had a quick look at this port, and noted something strange: it depends
> > >on both tcl/tk 83 and 84; is that normal? CATEGORIES are set to tk83...
> > >
> > I wasn't sure what to do with that.  The port uses tk84 and does not 
> > require tk83, but there *is* no category for tk84 (should one be create?), 
> > so I left that alone.
> 
> Hmm... you're right! I was sure that tcl84 / tk84 exist.

They do (as virtual categories, just like the other tk*/tcl* virtual
categories)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20050801/095a6093/attachment.bin