Advice for handling of SWT dependency

Josh Elsasser josh at
Thu Sep 30 07:03:49 PDT 2004

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:42:14AM +0800, Gavin Mu wrote:
> I think making a separate port of SWT is a good idea, because a lot of
> applications need it. I have the same trouble with you, I want to make
> a port for lumaQQ, this is a QQ client in Java and use SWT in it.

Yea, I suppose I'll put together a port for SWT then.  I should
probably modify the eclipse port to use it instead of installing it's
own, but that's more effort than I'm willing to spend on this,
considering all I really wanted was to be able to run azureus on

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list