Kris Kennaway kris at
Mon Sep 20 10:45:29 PDT 2004

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:15:54AM +0100, Chris Stenton wrote:
> Is this port going to be fixed for 5.3? uvscan is dependent on this.

Unlikely - the security vulnerabilities have been there forever and
no-one has cared enough to backport fixes.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list