Ports with no pkg-plist files

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Saturday 16 October 2004 21:32, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:

> Just as a footnote: I personally would prefer to keep the pkg-plist
> files around.  They greatly simplify the task of determining what files
> are provided by an uninstalled port (I use a script I wrote that takes
> advantage of these files for just this purpose, in fact).

Seems like your script needs a rewrite then. pkg-plist isn't the canonical way 
to provide the packing list, it's just the most simple one. Some ports 
require something less simple, for some even having a separate file is 
overkill.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20041016/15ae9e95/attachment.bin