HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS.
Michael Nottebrock
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Sat Nov 13 18:33:06 GMT 2004
Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Saturday 13 November 2004 05:58 am, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 12:39:15AM +1100, Mark Russell wrote:
>>
>>>please back this out, it breaks things, I've never found an out of date
>>>index to be a problem, now not havign an index is causing problems, also
>>>the extra bandwidth for fetch index is a hassle.
>>
>>What things did it break ? If you want to save your bandwidth, you
>>can use "make index" in /usr/ports/.
>>
>
>
> If someone would commit ports/73612, we would have a fast generator like
> portindex back :).
Also sysutils/portsnap is an alternative for updating ports trees which
shouldn't be affected by the deletion of the indices from CVS either.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list