Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports

[Will Andrews]

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> You can't possibly seriously believe that the project will adopt this
> model without first seeing proof that it works and has significant
> advantages (and no significant disadvantages) over the existing model.
> 
> This (reengineering the ports tree) has been tried before, BTW.  It
> didn't fly, and the project (openpackages.org) is now dead.

That project had little to do with FreeBSD, and certainly wasn't
a "reengineering" of our ports tree.

Regards,
-- 
wca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040524/1f17037a/attachment.bin