ports/66740: [MAINTAINER] security/f-prot-sig: update to 20040517

Remko Lodder remko at elvandar.org
Thu May 20 12:30:39 PDT 2004


Fernan,

*stripped your reply since it's huge*

I can agree with your proposal, perhaps when stated how critical etc 
should be used it gets more clear for everyone.

A thought:

source/ports: stuff totally not functioning anymore, the base system is 
unable to perform it's normal tasks
for docs:

Serious:

Source/ports: The system is able to run, but has some minor faults that 
limit the services running on the host..
for docs: The documentation is totally incorrect, telling you to enter 
yes instead of no on a crucial part of a base application. (giving up 
security etc).

Non critical:

source/ports: there are some errors in the make, but the application 
works, no services are impacted on the base and ports system.
for docs: typo's, weird explaination etc.





-- 


Kind regards,

Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the 
hackerscene


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list