ports/66740: [MAINTAINER] security/f-prot-sig: update to
20040517
Remko Lodder
remko at elvandar.org
Thu May 20 12:30:39 PDT 2004
Fernan,
*stripped your reply since it's huge*
I can agree with your proposal, perhaps when stated how critical etc
should be used it gets more clear for everyone.
A thought:
source/ports: stuff totally not functioning anymore, the base system is
unable to perform it's normal tasks
for docs:
Serious:
Source/ports: The system is able to run, but has some minor faults that
limit the services running on the host..
for docs: The documentation is totally incorrect, telling you to enter
yes instead of no on a crucial part of a base application. (giving up
security etc).
Non critical:
source/ports: there are some errors in the make, but the application
works, no services are impacted on the base and ports system.
for docs: typo's, weird explaination etc.
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder
Elvandar.org/DSINet.org
www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the
hackerscene
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list