kris at obsecurity.org
Thu May 20 00:25:52 PDT 2004
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 03:14:02AM -0400, Adam McLaurin wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2004 03:07:10 -0400
> Adam McLaurin <adam.mclaurin at gmx.net> wrote:
> > -# ls -al /usr/ports/INDEX*
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5089899 May 1 08:57 /usr/ports/INDEX
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4947853 Mar 15 18:20 /usr/ports/INDEX-5
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10911744 Apr 6 01:21 /usr/ports/INDEX.db
> > Looking at http://www.freshports.org/shells/zsh , the zsh port hasn't
> > been modified since March 23rd, so I should be OK on that front.
> > And portversion does also report that zsh is up-to-date:
> > -# portversion -v |grep -i zsh
> > zsh-4.2.0 = up-to-date with port
> Hmm now I've got myself confused; is it INDEX or INDEX-5 I should be
> looking at here?
INDEX-5 is for 5.x.
> In any case, even portversion reports zsh as up-to-date, so something
> does appear to be wrong.
Maybe portupgrade doesn't use the INDEX files any more. Try updating
your INDEX-5 either with portsdb -uU or by downloading from
www.freebsd.org/ports/INDEX-5 and retry.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040520/72a936b6/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports