x11-wm/xwmm [WAS: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder]

Michael Nottebrock michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Fri May 14 12:03:09 PDT 2004

On Friday 14 May 2004 20:34, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> >
> > As far as we are concerned, it's orphaned, and if someone else wants to
> > maintain it they can.
> The point is: is it obsolete? Should it be removed from the ports tree?
> I guess no one has better expertise than kde@ to decide on this.

We wanted to remove it long ago, but there was loud demand we didn't, so we 
just dropped maintainership. Nobody in kde@ cares about qt23 anymore and I 
myself deny any expertise about it :-).

However, the "problem" raised by Michael is bogus: qt23 conflicts with qt3x 
and a conflict isn't a bug and no grounds for removing anything either.

   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040514/289cf712/attachment-0001.bin

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list