mike.patterson at unb.ca
Thu May 13 05:50:00 PDT 2004
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> logjam is logjam-3.0.4, logjam2 is logjam-4.4.0, the former has
> obviously been withdrawn from the distribution site. shouldn't
> the deskutils/logjam2 port be moved into deskutils/logjam? the name
> certainly doesn't make any sense.
I didn't create either of the original ports, nor am I the maintainer of
the logjam port.
Having said that, 3.0.4 is the last stable version that does not require
GTK2. I think there are still some people who would favour that
version, although I'm sure Joe would have something to say about that.
Having said *that*, it appears that 3.0.4 is indeed now gone from the
logjam download page, so the point may be moot. If it's decided that
3.0.4 should stay on, I'm willing to find a copy of the original source
tarball and host it. Otherwise, I guess the 3.0.4 version should be
removed from ports, but I've no idea what the ramifications are of
changing port names.
(Removing original poster from Cc: list as his .signature seems to imply
he desires. :-) )
More information about the freebsd-ports