[ports-sparc64@bento.FreeBSD.org: libticables-3.7.7_2 failed on sparc64 5]

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Tue May 11 11:30:56 PDT 2004

On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 03:23:04PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:

> Apparently src/sys/sparc64/include/sysarch.h uses utrap_entry_t and
> utrap_handler_t without defining them. They are however defined in
> src/sys/sparc64/utrap.h.
> So I'm wondering, should I file a PR for my port to include
> machine/utrap.h before machine/sysarch.h in case of a sparc64 build
> (or get rid of it since it is only used on i386), or should I file a
> PR for src/sys/sparc64/include/sysarch.h to include machine/utrap.h
> (probably wrapped inside an #ifndef _KERNEL)?

Thanks for investigating the problem.  You should ask for advice from
the sparc64@ mailing list.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040511/86a90a40/attachment.bin

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list