USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?
eikemeier at fillmore-labs.com
Mon May 3 09:02:57 PDT 2004
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not.
> No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry
> *after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.
More information about the freebsd-ports