USE_QT_VER after including

Oliver Eikemeier eikemeier at
Mon May 3 09:02:57 PDT 2004

Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
>>including, using OPTIONS or not. 
> No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry 
> *after* <> for a long time.

I'm impressed.

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list