USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk?

[Oliver Eikemeier]

Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> 
>>Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> 
> 
>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port
>>>maintainers serves no purpose?
>>
>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before*
>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not. 
> 
> No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in security/pinentry 
> *after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time.

I'm impressed.