cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist
ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh
Pav Lucistnik
pav at FreeBSD.org
Wed Mar 24 08:57:23 PST 2004
V st, 24. 03. 2004 v 17:50, David O'Brien píše:
> > > clement 2004/03/23 08:08:33 PST
> > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > > Modified files:
> > > devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist
> > > Added files:
> > > devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh
> > > Log:
> > > - kill .la files
> > > - bump PORTREVISION
> ...
> > I object to both of the stated purposes for this commit. First, it's
> > been discussed to death that 1. .la files sometimes serve a useful
> > purpose, and 2. deleting them does not serve a useful purpose. Second,
> > if a user has the port installed already, a bumped PORTREVISION would
> > suggest to them that there is some benefit in deleting the existing port
> > and reinstalling. Here that is clearly not the case.
>
> Agreed WRT bumping PORTREVISION. Why does it seem almost all ports
> committers today think PORTREVISION must be bumped with ever single
> commit?? This does nothing but cause unnecessary great churn when using
> pkg_version and portupgrade.
PORTREVISION should be raised when there's a change (even minor) in the
package. Axing a file from plist is a good reason for PORTREVISION
raise.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
Shop at the Mobius Strip Mall: Always on the same side of the street!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040324/525f88b4/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list