kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Mar 23 22:33:36 PST 2004
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:26:35AM -0500, Kaarthik Sivakumar wrote:
> >>> "GJ" == Gary Jennejohn <garyj at jennejohn.org> writes:
> GJ> Wouldn't hurt since I, the maintainer, can't get into freefall to
> GJ> do any commits.
> Ok, I will file a pr.
> GJ> This is really a nit! xemacs has bigger problems, but what the
> GJ> heck.
> I know, but a user did mention on the xemacs-beta mailing list that
> 21.5 is gamma and that raised concerns there about our packaging. So..
> What bigger problems do you see with xemacs? I run
> compiled-from-source xemacs 21.5.x and other than standard beta
> software problems with xemacs in general (ie not FreeBSD specific),
> everything seems ok. I use compiled-from-source 21.4 at work and that
> is quite good.
Any chance you could submit a patch to update the ports to the current
versions? They're a bit behind right now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040323/6262bd64/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports