Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS
kris at obsecurity.org
Sun Mar 21 15:28:36 PST 2004
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:21:53AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have
> > duplicate LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a
> > unique LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid
> > overwriting each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your
> > ports conflict with ports maintained by another person, please
> > coordinate your efforts with them.
> > dansguardian www/dansguardian-devel fcash at bigfoot.com
> > dansguardian www/dansguardian fcash at sd73.bc.ca
> Since these ports are marked as NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for licensing
> reasons, do they need a link on the FTP server??
> If they do, I'll submit a PR (or someone can make the following change)
> dansguardian www/dansguardian
> dansguardian-devel www/dansguardian-devel
LATEST_LINK may be used for other things too..they should still be fixed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040321/7fe98bca/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports