I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right?
michaelnottebrock at gmx.net
Fri Mar 19 04:23:06 PST 2004
On Friday 19 March 2004 05:58, Paul Seniura wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:51:59PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
> OTOH, allowing mplayer to use its original author's -O3
> setting made a *huge* difference For The Better on the Puny
> Pentium2 -- it's actually usable now.
> Same goes for KDE and its millions of modules with -O2.
With regard to to KDE I am very, VERY, V E R Y certain you're fooling yourself
> But what about the public pkgs.
> Because of these -O tests on 'dumber' Ps, I have been on
> record on this list for wanting FBSD maintainers to stop
> editting the CFLAGS from the original author's settings.
> They likely have tested it with gcc on i386, we use gcc
> on i386, so the original settings ought to stay put.
Most authors don't test things like different optimizations at all, let alone
gcc 2.x vs gcc 3.x, and different platforms ... don't even start. Experience
clearly shows that CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS enforcement is necessary to reliably get
packages built on a multiplatform project like FreeBSD.
> IMO it'd be better time spent in getting gcc up to par. ;)
I've not been too-big-a-fan of the whole icc effort myself in the past (and I
still don't have the port installed, nor am I likely to be going to - the
hoops you have to jump through to even get it are ridiculous IMHO), but for
all I can tell your worries really are unreasonable - all of them.
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi at freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040319/be8c022e/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports