I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right?

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Friday 19 March 2004 02:51, Paul Seniura wrote:
> They are/were actually
> considering publicly distributing kernels built with icc --
> something we are not privvy to use, as I understand the
> license, and so must be clearly marked.

I really think you read the license wrong there. The _binaries_ produced by 
ICC (commercially licensed, netchild@ says the project has a commercial 
license) can be used by anyone - in fact, I'm pretty sure lots of your 
collegues are using icc-compiled binaries on Windows systems right now.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20040319/d3087094/attachment.bin