[Fwd: Re: Failure At Build (?) Stage When Making Ports?]

[Drew Tomlinson]

On 3/17/2004 9:34 AM Mark Linimon wrote:

>I'm too sleep-deprived to come up with the "right" answer
>right now, but ...
>  
>
Thank you for giving me a little of your time.  Now get some rest... :-)

>for comparison purposes, try the following on both machines,
>in the directory of some port that is known to fail:
>
>make -V LOCALBASE
>make -V PORTSDIR
>make -V WRKDIRPREFIX
>make -V CONFIGURE_WRKSRC
>make -V BUILD_WRKSRC
>  
>
 From blacklamb, the one that has the ports tree locally:

blacklamb# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula      
blacklamb# make -V LOCALBASE
/usr/local
blacklamb# make -V PORTSDIR
/usr/ports
blacklamb# make -V WRKDIRPREFIX
/var/tmp
blacklamb# make -V CONFIGURE_WRKSRC
/var/tmp/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula/work/bacula-1.32f-5
blacklamb# make -V BUILD_WRKSRC
/var/tmp/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula/work/bacula-1.32f-5

And from blacksheep, the one whose ports tree is mounted from blacklamb 
via smbfs:

blacksheep# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula
blacksheep# make -V LOCALBASE
/usr/local
blacksheep# make -V PORTSDIR
/usr/ports
blacksheep# make -V WRKDIRPREFIX
/var/tmp
blacksheep# make -V CONFIGURE_WRKSRC
/var/tmp/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula/work/bacula-1.32f-5
blacksheep# make -V BUILD_WRKSRC
/var/tmp/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula/work/bacula-1.32f-5

>All of this stuff is explained, somewhat cryptically, starting
>around line 500 of Mk/bsd.port.mk.
>  
>
I will read this.  Thanks again!!!

Drew